Social perspectives on corporate responsibility: Monsanto and its community development Essay

Socialpositionsondegree CelsiussorporateResponsibility:

Monsanto and its community development


Peoples all demand for the corporations to be involved in the society, self-monitored themselves in implementing their policies and reviewed their guidelines in different facets in order to keep a sustainable development. The concern should play an active function in “using resources to run into the demands of the present without compromising the ability of future coevalss to run into their ain needs” ( Linton et al. , 2007, p. 1076 ) . “With great power comes great responsibility.” This celebrated Spider-Man phrase can besides use to presents concern theoretical account.

Corporate societal duty is a morality and political orientation theoretical account or pattern for concern to analyze their commercial activities in order to obtain sustainability to the stakeholders. It follows that, the companies need to see the entire benefits and costs as a whole, but non merely maximising their private additions. Howard Bowen is the first one to discourse the commercial moralss and responsibilities on an academic degree. In 1953, he published a important article “Social duties of the businessman” ( Bowen, 1953 ) .

This book has systemically discussed about the societal duties, corporate citizenship, and sustainability which are carried out by business people. Furthermore, Howard has established a model about the moral criterions and the philosophical constructs to the companies behave toward our society and stakeholders. It follows ethical behavior toward stakeholders and recognizes the spirit of the legal and regulative environment ( Bowen, 1953 ) .

By the same item, Archie B. Carroll has besides studied on societal public presentation theoretical account which is a 3-dimensional conceptual theoretical account to measure and depict their Acts of the Apostless to the community ( Carroll, 1978 ) . First, it defined the corporate societal responsibilities. Then, it identified the societal issues associating to their activities. At last, he analyzed the doctrine for the organisation and the rests from the societal degree. Under this theoretical account, the societal duties have been divided into four classs: economic, legal, ethical and discretional.

For economic sciences aspect, Archie suggested it is the first and of import responsibility for concern to mark-up its net incomes at a market and societal acceptable degree. For legal position, the planetary expects the commercials to run into the legal and authorities administration. For morality, the companies have to follow the implied ethical footings to do their managerial determinations and their internal control system which can supervise their activities in a good religion. In add-on, for the discretional duty is an perfectly voluntary act taken by the concern to lend to the society scrupulously.

Actions must be taken after detecting jobs. Archie illustrated the four actions taken by the houses, which are reaction, defend, accommodate and lead.

The first action is reaction which are declining to accept any societal duty and switching the load to the populace. The 2nd response is defend. Granted, the companies take action to protect the companies’ good will. But they take action every bit few as possible. Accommodate is the 3rd response that can be made by the entities. Under this class, the entities will pass on with parties who are involved before any action has been made. Lead is the perfect thought for the companies to manage the issue before it has widely reported and take a sufficient action that is much more than expected.

Background of Monsanto

Based on the above concern theoretical account, it can be easy evaluate and critique an entity in their community development and their deductions on society and stakeholders.

Before analyzing any actions taken by Monsanto Company, it is necessary to understand the background information about the Monsanto Company. Monsanto is a chemical company that produce agriculturalchemicals, viz. cloying and 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid before 1960s. In 1976, the most profitable and marketable merchandise, Roundup, has been announced. Thisherbicide is a pesticide has been used for the universe in extinguishing any otiose planted to protect the workss up til now. Monsanto has besides launched a Roundup Ready Soybean to the market. Monsanto claims that Roundup Ready Soybean can turn healthily under Monsanto’s pesticide. Since there is a alteration of concern nature, Monsanto’s foremost geneticallymodified merchandise Bovine Growth Hormone is commercialized to the populace in 1994. In present, the company is a multi-national industry leader which is engaged in geneticallymodified technological development and pesticide bring forthing.

Monsanto and its community development

A military undertaking ran by U.S. Army called Operation Ranch Hand, which is a undertaking to unclutter up six million estates of woods in Vietnam during the Vietnam War ( Warwick, 1998 ) . This defoliant is called Agent Orange and it is produced by Monsanto ( Beder, 1997 ) . 11 million gallons of Agent Orange was used during the war and gave incubuss to many Vietnamese and their posterities. 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-paradioxin ( TCDD ) which is the most toxic component to people has released during the use of Agent Orange ( Roberts, 1991 ) . Incredibly, the dioxin taint inside the military arm is 1000 times higher than the normal usage and besides over the World Health Organization’s restriction ( Roberts, 1991 ) . It is non surprise there is a research demoing the usage of biological arm leads to serious unwellness. In peculiar, those unwellnesss are related with liver, tegument or even malignant neoplastic diseases ( Rachel ‘s Environment & A ; Health Weekly, 1991 ) . Hence, there are more than 500,000 malformations caused by TCDD in Vietnam since 1960’s ( Roberts, 1991 ) . However, Monsanto did non pay any compensation to the victims. Monsanto took a denying attitude when confronting the issue harmonizing to the Archie concern duty theoretical account. In 2012, a jurisprudence instance have brought by two American who are citizens of the metropolis of fabricating the Agent Orange. The victims asked for medical redress to retrieve the costs of taking dioxin. Still, the instance is still in legal processing and no held is made by the tribunal ( Sissell, 2012 ) .

There is a similar instance about fabricating the polychlorinated biphenyl in Anniston, Alabama. In 1966, Monsanto has discovered the contaminated H2O with polychlorinated biphenyl would kill fishes at a short period of clip. While no 1 has announced this issue, the intelligence has been hidden by Monsanto and its related party for 40 old ages ( Grunwald, 2001 ) . An probe by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry discovered the high polychlorinated biphenyl degree inside organic structure of Anniston citizens and the amendss to the air and dirt in the town ( ATSDR, 2000 ) . Another survey successfully found out the true linkage between the biphenyl and its consequence to human ( Silverstone et al. , 2012 ) . The study covered the citizen’s blood and high blood pressure, blood force per unit area, and diabetes. Even these studies have indicated the liabilities should be borne by Monsanto, the entity merely settle the claim about after 40 old ages. They have agreed to pay the complainant 700 1000000s U.S.D. in August 2003 ( The New York Times, 2003 ) . Using the concern responsibility theoretical account introduced by Archie, Monsanto merely fulfil the legal duty to counterbalance the people who are in suffered.

A research published in 2002 showed that the Roundup provokes cell division disfunction. To set it merely, Roundup is a deciding factor in impacting the motion and growing of cells. Therefore, the possibility of malignant neoplastic disease will be higher than non utilizing Roundup ( Marc, 2002 ) . Problems besides found in Monsanto’s geneticallymodified merchandise, Bovine Growth Hormone, besides known as rBST. This endocrine can increase the productiveness of bring forthing milk, and the contentions associating this endocrine ne’er halt controversy ( Cerro, 1996 ) . There is two terra incognitas which are non answered by Monsanto, and the Food and Drug Administration before commercializing this GM merchandise. The first job is the containment inside the rBST, cloning amino acid, is non proved to be healthy for human existences ( Biotechnology and the American agricultural industry, 1991 ) . The 2nd uncertainness is the growing rate of the Insulin-like growing factor 1, which will be affected by the usage of Monsanto’s Bovine Growth Hormone ( Cerro, 1996 ) . The Insulin-like growing factor 1 is a cistron to command the growing of people and assess human good health. Still, Monsanto did non response to this issue nor analyze any research.

Apart from their merchandises, Monsanto besides involve in certain societal activities. One Million Challenge is a undertaking for public to direct their proposals for bring forthing clean Na chloride watercourse in an advanced manner ( Environmental scientific discipline & A ; engineering, 1995 ) . Monsanto is besides an entity who cares about academic developments. In U.K. , there is common trust fund which is set up by Monsanto and other British intuitions in endorsing up the finance of the biotechnology surveies since 1982 ( Nature, 1982 ) . The Washington University awarded a U.S.D. $ 23.5 million fund for a five-year undertaking in which the wellness and medical research ( Culliton, 1982 ) . In 2000, Monsanto is the first company to donate their licence to research workers in order to supply technological supports in bettering the development of aureate rice. Golden Rice is geneticallymodified rice which contains lager ?-carotene. The ?-carotene finally transform into vitamin Angstrom in our organic structure system. Importantly, the Golden Rice can assist four 1000000s people who suffer from vitamin A lack and other vision jobs ( Normile, 2000 ) . For clear uping the public concerts and the professionals’ rights, there are at least 25 classs of private agronomic researches can be used by the scientists and the authorities ( Waltz, 2010 ) .


Harmonizing to the concern moralss and societal duties theories set by Howard and Archie, we can understand how the company can impact the community in legal, environment, metaphysic, or even wellness.

As a multi-national biochemical leader, the planetary expects the house to act in the manner that is higher than the normal societal outlooks. The community would anticipate the company to bear the discretional duty which is a sort of societal responsibility to construct up first-class concern good will for the company. Be that as it may, Monsanto has merely performed the economic sciences facet and portion of the legal facet, viz. the instance about the compensation for the polychlorinated biphenyl pollution in Anniston. Harmonizing Archie’s morality theoretical account, the corresponding actions taken by Monsanto did non satisfied the populace. Monsanto merely took deny and support attitude to response those public issues, such as biological arms, pollution in, Roundup wellness job and endocrine job. They shift some of the issues to the tribunal and allow the tribunal to find the truth. Unfortunately, they are non willing to clear up the public concerns for some instances. Therefore, public are non willing to swear the company and their merchandises. For case, the GM milk and GM nutrient are non welcome in Europe.

Even they have batch of suites to better their unity and problem-solving attitude, we should non outweigh the part of Monsanto on biotechnology.

Reference List

“ $ 700 Million Settlement in Alabama PCB Lawsuit. ”New York Times( New York ) , August 21, 2003. hypertext transfer protocol: // accountid=10382.

American Medical Association.Biotechnology and the American Agricultural Industry. Council on Scientific Mfairs, American Medical Association, 1991. hypertext transfer protocol: // articleid=385359 & A ; hkulsid=013AAFE0F705FCD622398D3281CE1B9E3952C3CC334CFEB31A560EB74073D71D0A2FA4AA525AA923DD31085ACBEA30A21F1CF70560E056E9.

Beder, Sharon.Global Spin: The Corporate Assault on Environmentalism. Foxhole, Dartington, Devon: Green Books, 1997.

Bowen, Howard Rothmann.Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New York: Harper, 1953. hypertext transfer protocol: //

Carroll, A.B. “ A Three-dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. ”The Academy of Management Review4, no. 4 ( 1979 ) : 497-505. hypertext transfer protocol: //

Cerro, Kristine. “ High-tech Cattles: The BST Controversy. ”San Joaquin Agricultural Law Review 6163 ( 1996 ) : 163-192. hypertext transfer protocol: // page=163 & A ; handle=hein.journals/sjlar6 & A ; collection=journals.

CULLITON, B.J. “ Monsanto Gives Washington U. $ 23.5 Million. ”Science216, no. 4552 ( 1982 ) : 1295-1296. hypertext transfer protocol: //

“ Entrepreneurship: Monsanto act. ”Nature298 ( 1982 ) : 505. hypertext transfer protocol: //

Grunwald, Michael. “ Monsanto Hid Decades Of Pollution: PCBs Drenched Ala. Town, But No One Was Ever Told. ” Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy. Last modified January 3, 2002. hypertext transfer protocol: //

Kara, Sissell. “ Monsanto Agent Orange Lawsuit Goes to Trial. ”Chemical Week, January 2, 2012. hypertext transfer protocol: // accountid=10382.

Linton, JonathanD. , Robert Klassen, and Vaidyanathan Jayaraman. “ Sustainable supply ironss: An debut. ”Journal of Operations Management25, no. 6 ( 2007 ) : 1076. hypertext transfer protocol: //

Marc, Julie ; Mulner-lorillon, Odile ; Boulben, Sandrine ; Hureau, Dorothee ; Durand, Gael ; Belle , Robert. “ Pesticide Roundup Provokes Cell Division Dysfunction at the Level of CDK1/Cyclin B Activation. ”Chemical research in toxicology15, no. 3 ( 2002 ) : 326-331. hypertext transfer protocol: //

Monsanto. “ Monsanto. ”Environmental scientific discipline & A ; engineering29, no. 12 ( 1995 ) : 528. hypertext transfer protocol: //

Normile, Dennis. “ Agricultural BIOTECHNOLOGY: Monsanto Donates Its Share of Golden Rice. ”Science289, no. 5481 ( 2000 ) : 843-845. doi:10.1126/science.289.5481.843.

“ REPORT LINKS HERBICIDE EXPOSURE TO ILLNESSES AMONG VIETNAM VETS. ”RACHEL ‘s Hazardous Waste News, December 19, 1990. hypertext transfer protocol: //

Roberts, Leslie. “ Dioxin Risks Revisited. ”Science251, no. 4994 ( 1991 ) : 924. hypertext transfer protocol: //

Schoenherr, Tobias. “ The function of environmental direction in sustainable concern development: A multi-country probe. ”International Journal of Production Economics1, no. 140 ( 2012 ) : 116-128. hypertext transfer protocol: //

Silverstone, Allen E. Rosenbaum, Paula F. Weinstock, Ruth S. Bartell, Scott M. Foushee, Herman R. Shelton, Christie Pavuk, Marian.Polychlorinated Biphenyl ( PCB ) Exposure and Diabetes: Consequences from the Anniston Community Health Survey. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, 2012. hypertext transfer protocol: //

U. S. Department of Health and Human Services.Evaluation OF SOIL, BLOOD & A ; AIR DATA FROM ANNISTON, ALABAMA CALHOUN COUNTY, ALABAMA. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 2000. hypertext transfer protocol: // docid=930 & A ; pg=0.

Waltz, Emily. “ Monsanto relaxes limitations on sharing seeds for research. ”Nature Biotechnology28 ( 2010 ) : hypertext transfer protocol: //

Warwick, Hugh. “ Agent Orange: The Poisoning. ”The Ecologist28, no. 5 264-265. hypertext transfer protocol: // dps= .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *