The Olive Trees” by Vincent new wave Gogh caught my oculus every bit shortly as I saw it. Van Gogh has ever fascinated me with his dramatic usage of colour and the thick texture he used while painting. After making some research, I learned that he painted “The Olive Trees” in 1890 after voluntarily come ining an refuge at Saint-Remy ( MoMA ) . It has been said that new wave Gogh ‘s endowment flourished in the last two old ages of his life while at Saint-Remy. Although he died at the mature age of 37, he was a busy adult male. He created over 200 oil pictures during his life. Some of his most celebrated pieces are The Starry Night, Portrait of Dr. Gachet, and Irises.
“The Olive Trees” is an oil on canvas picture that measures 28 5/8 ten 36” ( MoMA ) . This piece is in the post-impressionist manner. Postimpressionists extended Impressionism while rejecting its deficiency of emotions. Artists continued to utilize graphic colourss, thick application of pigment, typical coppice shots, and real-life capable affair ( Topofart ) . The post-impressionist manner is seen throughout most of new wave Gogh ‘s plants and particularly in “The Olive Trees” .
Van Gogh used thick oil pigment combined with broad unsmooth brushstrokes to make texture in this piece. This technique called “impasto” is apparent in many of his other plants such as “The Starry Night” ( Frank ) . The topic of the image is olive trees. These trees could be found all around the refuge he admitted himself to. This picture seems to hold a lighter temper than some of the other pictures he completed right before his decease. It seems that he, “found happiness” or something that got his head off of the deep depression and mental illness he had. The spectator can see it in this piece by looking at the usage of colour and dance lines he used to make a happy, but laid-back temper in the piece. This technique can besides be seen in his other plants such as “Starry Night” .
Not merely did he utilize colour and line to buoy up the temper of the piece, but he besides used form. Van Gogh painted the olive trees, mountains, and overcast all by utilizing organic form. This creates a flow of line, mass, and infinite. By utilizing these effects, van Gogh creates a ocular rollercoaster for the spectator to follow. At first glimpse, the spectator ‘s eyes roll from the grass up to the olive trees, and so across the blue colored mountains. By utilizing this flow of line, the picture has a alone balance to it which allows no infinite to look empty. The picture seems lively and the olive trees create a temper of dancing across the landscape.
Van Gogh created a good balanced atmosphere by utilizing the visible radiation colored clouds to equilibrate out the blues used in the mountains. The clouds besides help to equilibrate the agreement of leafy vegetables he used for the foreground and olive trees. This is called symmetrical balance. I believe van Gogh used this in his work non merely make a good fluxing piece, but besides to acquire the viewing audiences eyes to travel across the picture. By making this, he keeps the spectator ‘s eyes from gazing at one subdivision of the picture. Alternatively, the spectator receives an emotional appreciation from the flow of line, colour, and texture that the picture offers.
Overall, I truly bask this piece of art. Although it is non one of new wave Gogh ‘s most-known pieces, it is one of my favourites. I tend to travel against the grain and take things that I find interesting alternatively of traveling with the “social norm” . His usage of colour and texture is what keeps me looking at his work. I think the temper and emotion that he gave off by this picture could non be done with any other colour.
Obviously van Gogh had a message and an emotion that he wanted to portray in this piece, and I think he conveyed it absolutely. I think van Gogh was conveying a since of hope and felicity from this piece. His usage of line and texture creates motion in the picture and a sense of joy. The bright cloud contrasts against the olive trees and seems to lighten up the piece non merely through colour, but emotionally every bit good. The picture is a joy to look at and will stay that manner for a long clip to come.
Diego Rivera was born into a affluent household in Mexico. From the age of 10, Rivera studied art at the Academy of San Carlos in Mexico City ( Biography ) . He was sponsored to go on survey in Europe by the governor of Veracruz ( Biography ) . After his reaching in Europe in 1907, he began to analyze art with a figure of good known creative persons. A few old ages subsequently Picasso and Georges Braque began acquiring global exposure with their new type of art, Cubism. From 1913-1918, he devoted himself about wholly to the cubist school of art ( Arttrader ) . In 1920, Rivera left France and spent a short clip in Italy. While at that place, Rivera studied frescoes and the popular plants from the Renaissance period ( Biography ) .
In 1921, Rivera returned to Mexico to get down on what I personally believe to be some of his best plant. He began to paint wall paintings in auditoriums, schools, and other assorted authorities edifices. Most of his art carried political influence which he believed in. Rivera was a Communist and his work shared that of his political beliefs and how he felt about the Mexican people.
He began to develop his ain native manner based on big, simplified figures and bold colourss. Although his pictures were beautiful, his onslaughts on the church and political beliefs made him a controversial figure. ( Biography ) . Some of his best known plants during this clip are: En el Arsenal, Creation, and The Flower Carrier. Rivera painted frescoes in this manner for many old ages up until his decease in 1957 ( Biography ) .
I chose to make my paper on one of his pieces with a Cubist influence. It was completed in 1912 while he was in France. The graphics is called “Cubist Landscape” . It is an oil on canvas that measures 25 ?” x 35 ?” ( MoMA ) . I chose this piece of art because it reminds me of my grandma. She was a quilter, and at first glimpse, this picture reminds me of a hodgepodge comforter. Cubism was a immense influence in Rivera ‘s earlier calling, and this was one of his first plants in France. The content of this piece is a landscape filled with trees of different colourss and a colourful sky with a mountain in the background.
To me, it looks like you are looking at four different pictures that have been sat on top of each other at different angles. The usage of the cubism manner in this picture is really apparent due to non merely the name, but the manner the object of the image and background are “chopped” up and distorted throughout the piece. Rivera used large balls of different objects to do this piece so it is non every bit distorted as the plants of Picasso. I believe he did this so the spectator would non lose accent on the emotion Rivera was seeking to acquire the spectator to experience.
Rivera balanced the picture by utilizing the Cubist manner to segment the painting out in to different pieces. The oculus is specifically drawn to the lighter-green tree in the forepart. This tree is standing directly while all the other trees are dead set and tilting in different waies. By making this, Rivera made the tree in the forepart the topic of the piece, and made your eyes be drawn straight to this object. Line besides played a function in the emotion and accent on the tree. He emphasized the forepart tree even more by doing it more elaborate and by giving the bole of it texture. It stands straight up compared to the other 1s to typify strength and power.
The background of the graphics is where the emotion in the picture is created. The background is colored in a hodgepodge of the colour wheel. Greens, reds, oranges, blues, violets, and yellows are all woven into the background to make a happy temper that surrounds the trees. The other trees besides fall into the back land and are ruddy and bluish. I think the added colour that surrounds the topic gives the piece a lighter feeling and makes the spectator want to smile.
I besides like the usage of Impressionism in the piece. Around the boundary line of the picture, Rivera dashed colour on the background to make a meadow-like scene to the piece. The usage of different colour reminds me of wild flowers rocking in the zephyr. He created what the oculus would really see in a hayfield by utilizing broad, short coppice shots. The manner he painted the background reminds me of the brushstrokes used in “Impression Sunrise” by Monet. His short coppice shots besides give texture and motion to the piece. Short coppice shots make the piece expression soft in texture and give it motion as if there were a breezing blowing through the scene.
Overall I truly enjoyed this piece of art. Not merely did it remind me of my grandma, but it besides gave me a new appreciation on the Cubist manner of art. I was non a fan of cubism until researching this piece because I did non “get it” . So many times when viewing audiences see cubism we want to run off because we can non understand what we are looking at. In this piece Rivera makes it really clear and there is no underlying significance like some of the other Cubists ‘ work. It is direct and straight-forward and that is why I chose it. This piece has caused me to hold on new significance and apprehension of the Cubist manner and I will decidedly encompass what I have learned.
Georgia O’Keeffe was born November 15th, 1887 in Sun Prairie, Wisconsin. She grew up most of her life in Wisconsin but moved off to travel to the Chatham Protest and Episcopal Institute in Williamsburg, Virginia in 1900. After graduating in 1904, she studied art at the Art Institute of Chicago and at the Art Students League in New York ( Georgia ) .
She is good known for her graphics and has won many awards such as the Gold Medal of Painting, the Medal of Freedom, and was presented the National Medal of Arts in 1985 by President Ronald Reagan ( Georgia ) . It is said that O’Keeffe revolutionized modern art in both her clip and to the present. She painted natural scenes which she vividly portrayed with a close-up position. She used art to convey that nature is every bit powerful as the widespread industrialisation of the period of her clip.
Georgia O’Keeffe married Alfred Stieglitz in 1924 ( Georgia ) . He was a celebrated lensman who put his married woman ‘s work in his gallery. In 1916, Georgia ‘s work was foremost exhibited and this is when her art began to be seen and appreciated. In 1949, O’Keeffe moved to New Mexico where her art took on a new dimension. She painted castanetss and desert scenes which captured the composure and bleakness of the desert ( Georgia ) .
During her calling as a painter, O’Keeffe has largely been remembered for her abstract manner of art. She painted many things you would see in nature. She painted them as she saw them, non has how most would see them. She created her manner of art by whizzing in on the object and painting things that the bare oculus would non be able to see. This was her representation of the flower or other object she was painting. Her manner of art has been viewed all over the universe and she is one of the most celebrated American creative persons to this twenty-four hours.
I chose “Lake George, Coat and Red” to make my paper on because the piece jumped out at me. The picture is oil on canvas and it was created in 1919 ( MoMA ) . This abstract piece is rich in texture and the temper of it warms your bosom and lightens your temper. Georgia non merely used line to make felicity in her piece, but she besides used the bright reds in the background to stress the dark colour of the picture. She used ruddy and bluish because they contrast one another, and it is a great manner to catch the spectator ‘s oculus. Not merely did O’Keeffe usage ruddy and blues in the picture, she besides used leafy vegetables, yellows, and orange. I ‘m non certain if each colour was meant to stand for different types of emotions, but it gives the piece a centre or “wholeness” since she used every colour.
Not merely is the colour balanced in this piece, but the manner she used the value in each chromaticity besides creates a centralised feel. Since the topic of the piece is a dark blue, I think O’Keeffe used the little white ball in the upper part of the picture to make a little mass that contrasts the heavy blues she used for the topic. Her usage of thick lines and texture besides contributes to the balance of the piece and gives the topic a since of flow and gracefulness that draws your eyes from the lower left-hand corner of the piece on towards the upper right-hand corner.
The picture ‘s size is 27 3/8” ten 23 ?” ( MoMA ) . This is an mean size piece for her, and I think she used this size to acquire the spectator to see the painting up near and visually “feel” the texture and the motion of the piece. Not merely did the size of the canvas play a function in how she wanted the spectator to experience, but the medium she used did every bit good. Georgia O’Keeffe used a batch of oil pigments to do her art because of the manner she could make texture throughout each piece with this medium.
She besides used oil pigments because she could intermix each colour easy to make the chromaticity she wanted. Scale besides played a immense portion of O’Keeffe ‘s work because most of her abstract art is a zoomed-in version of what the oculus can see. By utilizing this enlarged graduated table, O’Keeffe can do the spectator experience the emotion of the object.
Overall, I think that Georgia O’Keeffe mastered abstract art and I will go on to be a fan. She has everlastingly changed the manner art will be viewed and will be an inspiration for many creative persons to come. I would non alter anything about this piece because the size, colour, texture, medium, and line all play a portion in what O’Keeffe wanted to portray in this piece.
Paul Cezanne was a Gallic painter born January 19, 1839. He developed artistic involvements at an early age and was sent to Paris to analyze when he was 23. He has frequently been called the male parent of modern art, who “strove to develop an ideal synthesis of realistic representation, personal look, and abstract pictural order” ( Retro ) . While he was in Paris he studied the plants of Monet, Delacroix, and Gustave Courbet ( Retro ) . Cezanne ‘s early pictures show small resemblance to his later and more of import manner. The capable affair is dark and cheerless and includes phantasies, dreams, spiritual images, and a general subject concerned with decease ( Noteworthy ) . Most of the work from this epoch of his life was harshly criticized and was ne’er accepted in any art exhibitions.
In the 1870 ‘s, Cezanne began to alter his manner. He started utilizing brighter colourss and the spiritual topics he one time used in his pictures began to vanish ( Noteworthy ) . Cezanne ‘s pictures from the 1870s clearly show the influence of Impressionism. He used short brushstrokes characterized by Monet and other early Impressionist to portray what the “eyes see instead than what the head knows” ( Frank ) . Some of his most known pieces from this clip are “House of the Hanged Man” and “Portrait of Victor Choquet” ( Notable ) .
In the late 1870 ‘s Cezanne moved back to his place in southern France and isolated himself from the art universe. He began to make his ain manner of Impressionism, but he did non exhibit his art for about twenty old ages ( Noteworthy ) . Cezanne ‘s began to come out of his purdah during the 1890s. In 1895, a big figure of Cezanne ‘s pictures were shown, and public involvement in his work easy began to develop. By 1904 he was given an full room at the Salon d’Automne ( Noteworthy ) . Unfortunately he died October 22, 1906 due to natural causes ( Noteworthy ) . Though he died right when he was acquiring big acknowledgment for his work, Cezanne will be remembered as a favorite of modern art ( Noteworthy ) .
The piece of Cezanne ‘s work I chose was “Still Life with Fruit Dish” . This picture is an oil on canvas that measures 18 1/4 ten 21 1/2 ” ( MoMA ) . Harmonizing to MoMA,
[ Still life was an of import genre to Cezanne, who made about two hundred such pictures over the class of four decennaries. In “Still Life with Fruit Dish” he created a shoal, compressed infinite that flattens the sculptural volumes of dish, glass, and fruit. This picture was a prized ownership of the creative person Paul Gauguin, who described the image as “ an exceeding pearl, the apple of my oculus. ” It was merely when he needed money for medical attention that Gauguin unhappily parted with it. ]
I wholly agree with Gauguin. This picture is a antic illustration of how Cezanne created his ain manner of Impressionism. If the spectator were to set Monet ‘s work next to it, you could see the resemblance of Impressionism, but he or she could besides see both creative person ‘s personal manner difference. Monet was the innovator of Impressionism, but personally, I prefer what Cezanne did with this piece much more than “Impression: Sunrise” or “Water Lily Pond” by Monet.
In “Still Life with Fruit Dish” , Cezanne created most of the lines in the picture with midst, fleet brushstrokes in the Impressionist manner. Most of the lines in the picture are jagged and non really elaborate. The lighting in the piece looks like it is coming from the right and is reflecting down on the tabular array and the fruit bowl. By utilizing visible radiation this manner, Cezanne put accent on the fruit bowl which is the topic of the piece. Cezanne besides positioned the knife to indicate straight toward the fruit bowl. This guides the spectator ‘s eyes from the lower-right-hand corner of the painting straight to the topic. Since this piece is in the Impressionist manner, Cezanne painted what the eyes really see. Impressionists painted what they saw, so there is no underlying significance to this piece like plants of the Renaissance had.
The colourss Cezanne used give accent on the topic. The background is a dark-coloured wall. The tablecloth and fruit bowl are both bright white. Though bluish is sometimes used to arouse unhappiness in a spectator, I do non believe Cezanne was seeking to make unhappiness in this piece. The colourss he used for the fruits are realistic colourss and their leafy vegetables, yellows, and reds warm the picture dramatically. Cezanne used thick texture in this picture, but it does non make motion or beat in the piece like the plants of new wave Gogh ‘s did. I think here he used elusive texture merely so the picture would non look bland and level. The texture he used gives character to the fruit every bit good as the blue background.
Overall, I truly like this picture and wish I could hold a transcript in my house. So far it is my favourite picture I have written about. Cezanne ‘s realistic proportion, contrast, and usage of infinite besides drew my oculus to this piece. I like being able to see art and “know” what the creative person wanted you to see and experience. When looking at this picture, I instantly “got it” . After reading about Cezanne, I have decidedly acquired more cognition about the Impressionist manner and gained a new love for his type of art.
Pablo Picasso was a celebrated Spanish painter and sculpturer who lived from 1881-1973. He is best known for cofounding Cubism with Georges Braque. His male parent, Ruiz, was an creative person and influenced Picasso ‘s early plants. When Picasso was seven, his male parent began to give him formal preparation in pulling and picture ( Answers ) . Ruiz was a traditional creative person and teacher who believed that proper preparation required disciplined copying of celebrated graphics. Picasso became so bemused with art that he put his instruction second. After merely six old ages of picture, Picasso ‘s male parent realized that his boy was more gifted than him.
At the age of 13, Picasso took an entryway test to the Barcelona School of Fine Arts. After making his piece in merely a hebdomad, he was accepted and began taking categories ( Answers ) . Three old ages subsequently his male parent sent him to Madrid ‘s Royal Academy of San Fernando which was one of the most accepted art schools in Spain ( Answers ) . Shortly after inscribing at the Royal Academy, Picasso dropped out to travel to Paris in the early 1900 ‘s. His first chef-d’oeuvre was “Les Demoiselles d’Avignon” which he created in 1907. It was thought of as being controversial because of its mention to the female organic structure and masked faces he used ( Answers ) . From 1909-1912, Picasso continued to work closely with Georges Braque to make what would be known as “Cubism” ( Answers ) .
Though Cubism is a immense portion of Picasso ‘s work, the picture I chose has no cubist influence. My graphics is “Night Fishing at Antibes” . It is a 6’9” ten 11’4” oil on canvas that Picasso completed in 1939 ( MoMA ) . I chose this piece because I wanted to larn more about abstract art, and because I enjoy angling. The topic of this picture was based on “Picasso ‘s observation of dark scenes off the shore of Antibes in the South of France. Men went out and fished by the visible radiation of acetylene lamps ; the visible radiations attracted the fish to the surface, where they could be netted or speared” ( Lenin ) .
Some say that the picture has deeper significance that relates to the eruption of World War II, but after researching the subject to a great extent, I found that the thought is non for certain. The content in the picture is two fishermen in a boat. One has fishing line attached to his toe, and the other adult male is about to knife a fish with a spear. Two adult females are standing on a span to the right.
One adult female is keeping a bike and eating an ice pick cone. Picasso used symbolism in his pictures, and there must be symbolism in this piece, but after my research, I could non happen any concrete replies for why he painted “Night Fishing at Antibes” this manner. Most art critics believe that Picasso painted this piece as a war protest much like “Guernica” , but he ne’er announced that this was the picture ‘s significance ( Answers ) .
The size of the picture besides has to make something with the significance. This picture is about 12 pess broad and seven pess tall. If the significance of the piece is to protest WWII, Picasso created this picture to be the size of a hoarding. This would assist drive the underlying significance of the picture and convey what Picasso wanted to state about the war with a bold message.
Picasso created a well-lit piece by doing the moonshine radiance straight down on the H2O. This contrasts the fish on the right and makes the eyes look straight at it foremost. The piece is good balanced due to its big, dark background and little infinite of elation. The spectator ‘s eyes go straight toward the fish on the right non merely because of the lighting, but besides due to the manner Picasso used line. The lance has four heterosexual, thick pointers indicating straight at the fish. This lance besides looks like a trident. This could hold some clip of underlying significance every bit good.
The spear looks strong and bold. After steering your eyes up the shaft of the lance, your eyes impetus left across the arm of the fisherman. He is scaled much larger than the other fisherman in the boat and his eyes seem to be looking straight at the spectator. No other topics in the picture are looking towards the spectator except for this fisherman. The lance and the fisherman ‘s arm are by far the strongest lines in the piece. They are at 90 degree angles, unlike any of the other lines in the picture. Though the piece is constructed with strictly organic forms, the picture does non convey a since of motion or beat. To me the piece seems like a snapshot in clip catching everyone away guard.
The colourss Picasso used in the picture give the piece accent on what clip of twenty-four hours it is. The spectator can state the picture is a dark scene because of the rubric, but I believe Picasso painted a dark scene for an implicit in significance. Almost every colour in the picture is dark except for the H2O on which the Moon radiances down on. The dark chromaticities give the piece a cold and sad feeling. Merely by the colour entirely, I can state that I would non desire to be in this scene.
I truly liked this work when I foremost saw it, but after making research I have changed my position of it. Now cognizing what was traveling on in the universe at the clip, I feel that this picture has a much deeper significance than what I as immature college pupil can hold on. I will ever be a fan of Picasso ‘s work, but to be honest, I merely do non understand a batch of what he wants the spectator to catch on to. I like the picture, but I am really defeated after composing this paper.
Personally, I would hold instead picked a piece that I could hold understood than attempt to trail down the significance of this picture. I spent more clip making research on the underlying significance than I spent basking the picture. I felt like I was trailing my tail while making the study on this piece. Nonetheless, I am still a fan of Picasso ‘s and possibly one twenty-four hours the message of this piece ( if any ) will hit me.