Airbus In Service Department Biology Essay

Attention is drawn to the fact that right of first publication of this thesis rests with the writer. This transcript of the thesis has been supplied on status that anyone who consults it is understood to recognize that its right of first publication remainders with its writer and that no citation from this thesis and no information derived from it may be published without the anterior written consent of the writer.

This thesis may be available for audience within the University Library and may be photocopied or loaned to other libraries for the intent of audience.

Cheat AND PLAGIARISM

“ I certify that I have read and understood the subdivision in the MSc Student Handbook on Cheating and Plagiarism and that all stuff in this assignment is my ain work, except where I have indicated with appropriate mentions. ”

Name: K.A.AATHITHIYAVARSHAN

Student Number: 119340471

Signed: Date

Abstraction

Historic cognition and informations are used as a footing for future work often by Engineers. Airbus In-Service Department at Filton sets an illustration for this. Technical advice and expertness to clients around the universe in the field of flying fixs are offered. Future fixs carried out by citing past fix instances are in common pattern with the in-service section. Repair petitions from aircraft operators around the universe are dealt by In-service section. It is confronting growing in petitions and knowledge keeping jobs. Customer satisfaction and response to clients with in a really short period of clip are the cardinal ends of in-service section. To answer to their clients within a really short clip period the applied scientists are under terrible force per unit area. The clip force per unit area additions as the commercial air power industry grows. Finding suited historic instances expeditiously is vitally of import to get by up with the current scenario. The coevals of fix instructions is optimized by using old instances which act as mentions. The old instance certification is contained within Portable Document Format ( PDF ) files dwelling of fix inside informations and information rich elements such as diagrams and exposures. These elements can be used by the applied scientists to set up instances context and finally turn up a suited yesteryear instance on which to establish the fix direction. The context of this undertaking concerns the UK In-service Department of aircraft maker Airbus SAS, Filton. The service section in Filton trades with flying fix services. It investigates ways of bettering historic instance hunt techniques. This undertaking aims at back uping one of the Airbus in-service squad in developing an efficient system of techniques and procedures to pull out information rich elements. A set of historic instances are collected and analysed manually page by page. From this, a set of demands was defined that focused chiefly on better classification of instances, lineation of information rich paperss.

Contentss

ABSTRACT 3

Contentss 4

2. Introduction 9

2.1 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT 10

2.2 AIRBUS IN-SERVICE DEPARTMENT 10

2.3 Demand 11

2.4 State OF THE ART AND CURRENT RESEARCH 12

3. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 14

4. LITERATURE REVIEW 15

4.1 PORTABLE DOCUMENT FORMAT ( PDF ) 15

4.2 SAMPLE CASE 16

4.3 DOCUMENT DECOMPOSING 16

4.4 VISUAL REPRESENTATION OF DOCUMENTS 18

4.5 ROLE OF IMAGE AND GRAPHS 18

4.6 Summary: 20

5. METHODOLOGY AND DELEVERABLES 20

5.1 PHASE 1: Classification 21

5.1.1 SKETCH/GRAPHICS: 25

5.1.2 Correspondence: 28

5.1.3 Calculation: 31

5.1.4 Summary: 35

5.2 PHASE II COMMUNICATION AND REPORTS AVAILABLITY: 35

5.2.2 AVAILABLITY OF REPORTS: 36

5.2.3 DAMAGE DESCRIPTION AND DETAILS: 40

5.3 PHASE III INDIVIDUAL BREAKDOWN: 46

5.3.1 Detailed ANALYSIS OF CASE 11: 46

5.3.2 NATURE OF INFORMATION 49

5.3.3 Summary: 65

5.4. PHASE IV DECOMPOSITION 66

5.4.1 SUMMARY 72

6. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: 72

8. FUTURE WORK 75

Mentions: 76

APPENDIX 79

Figures:

FIGURE 1 CATERGORIZATION BREAKDOWN

FIGURE 2 TOTAL CASE SUMMARY GRAPH

FIGURE 3 PERCENTAGE CONTRIBUTIONS

FIGURE 4 SKETCH/GRAPHICS SUMMARY

FIGURE 5 CALCULATION SUMMARY GRAPHS

FIGURE 6: Communication Flow

FIGURE 7 REPORT SUMMARY GRAPH

FIGURE 8 CASE 11 SKETCH SUMMARY GRAPH

FIGURE 9 PROCESS OF DOCUMENT NATURE

FIGURE 10 CUSTOMER SERVICE DIRECTORATES

FIGURE 11 AERODYANMIC STATEMENTS

FIGURE 12 REPAIR DESIGN APPROVAL SHEET

FIGURE 13 STATIC STRENGTH APPROVAL SHEET

FIGURE 14 SERVICE SUMMARY SHEEET

FIGURE 15 TECHNICAL REPORTS

FIGURE 16 FATIGUE APPROVAL SHEET

FIGURE 17 F & A ; DT JUSTIFICATION

Tables:

Table 1 TOTAL CASES SUMMARY

Table 2: SKETCH/GRAPHICS Summary

Table 3 Correspondence

Table 4 CALCULATION SUMMARIES

Table 5 REPORTS Summary

Table 6 DAMAGE DESRIPTION

Table 7 REPORTS Summary

Table 8 CASE 11 SKETCH SUMMARY

Abbreviation

A/C AIRCRAFT

FD FORMAL DIAGRAM

FD+A FORMAL DIAGRAM + ANNOTATIONS

RDAS REPAIR DESIGN APPROVAL SHEET

SRM SERVICE REPAIR MANUAL

SISS SERVICE ITEMISED SUMMARY SHEET

TD TECHNICAL DISPOSITION

2. Introduction

Historic cognition and usage of old plants are being the key pillars for Engineers in transporting future work. This is common in service industry and peculiarly true for airbus in-service sector. It widely believed that there is a demand for Engineers to often mention old work or studies to organize or transport out their following activities.

The activities of the In-Service Department, the lineation of the old research undertaken and the overall construction of the study tantrum in this debut.

2.1 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT

Knowledge direction examines how administration can efficaciously pull off, shop, retrieve and augment their rational belongingss. ( Mark Ackerman et al. , 2003 ) . Newman ( 1992 ) defined knowledge direction as the procedure that governs the creative activity, airing, and use of cognition. O’Leary ( 1998 ) defined KM as pull offing the organisation ‘s cognition by making, structuring, airing and using it to heighten organisational public presentation. Alavi and Leidner ( 1999 ) said that the Process to get, form, and pass on cognition of employees so others may be more effectual in their work as Knowledge direction. Andriessen ( 2004 ) besides gives asimilar definition for KM as the Procedure to get, form, and communicate Knowledge. So from all the definitions it ‘s all about CREATE, CAPTURE, PRESERVE, TRANSFER, DISSEMINATE, UTILIZE

2.2 AIRBUS IN-SERVICE DEPARTMENT

Technical advice and expertness on flying harm across all Airbus aircraft are provided by Airbus In-service section based at Filton. Various fix and inspection and repair installations are available throughout the universe to transport out aircraft care. To transport out their ain care Airbus supplies a Structural Repair Manual ( SRM ) to all operators of their aircraft. However, the expertness of the In-Service Department are utilised when the fixs frequently fall outside the bounds of the manual, ( McMullen 2011 ) . Advice and assistance peculiarly on complex fixs are provided and direction are besides provided for fixs which is non available in the manual and proficient questions are answered

The services provided that scope from material supply and fix to full care. This is termed as Flight Hour Services by Airbus. From airbus website it ‘s apparent that the entire worldwide aircraft in operation is 6868 and 7368 figure of bringings.From Global market prognosis 2011 predicted by Airbus a sum of 27,850 bringings are predicted. A rapid growing is witnessed ( i.e. ) a 3.5 times more bringings are expected than current twelvemonth. From this Numberss the current work load of the in-service section applied scientists and the expected to increase in close hereafter is witnessed.

2.3 Demand

The growing of air power industry, in peculiar Airbus increases the work load of the in-service squad. In general the service carried out for each and every aircraft is recorded as instances for future mention for service and redesign intents. The clip the aircraft enters for service to the clip it leave the service station all activities are recorded and stored. Each and every recording are termed as instances and stored for future mentions. The addition in figure of instances is straight relative to increase in aircrafts in operation.

It is acknowledged that the entire depository presently is approximately 90,000 Pdf files. This is about 60,000GB+ file size, runing from 100KB to 89,000 MB. The current depository is increasing quickly as the In-Service squad digitise all of their historic paper files, which is to be done before December 2012. ( E.Carey, pers. Comm. , 15th August2012 ) . This Numberss are expected to lift as the air power industry expands. The historic instances stored are extracted or retrieved by the service and fix applied scientists. The rise in figure of instances reduces the efficiency of extraction procedure. It is approximately estimated that there are around 31000 PDF files as of Sept 06 and this figure quickly increased the to 60000 PDF files as of Sept 2011. The Numberss of files has doubled in clip span of 5 old ages. The storage size in Gigabytes has been recorded as 6.3 GB in 2005 and 72.5 in 2011. The storage size has besides been increased quickly.

To react to client fix petitions in a short period of clip the in-service section is under utmost force per unit area. They work to guarantee high public presentation with following marks ( McMullen 2011 ) :

A everyday question: answer within 48 hours.

A work arrest: answer within 8 hours. This is when an aircraft is in care and a job will do it to be returned to service tardily.

Aircraft on the land: answer within 4 hours. This is when an aircraft is prevented from taking off due to a job.

From Mccullen ‘s Understanding Damage Context, the overall purpose is to run into these marks in 97 % of instances. Last the rate was 98 % . Without extra staff members and betterment in hunt efficiency these will go more hard to accomplish as the work load additions.

2.4 State OF THE ART AND CURRENT RESEARCH

Many research related to database searching and usage of in-service information in Airbus has been carried out.

James McMullen ( 2011 ) carried out his concluding twelvemonth undertaking on Understanding Aircraft harm context. His research defines the undermentioned undertakings and the development carried out for the paradigm tools:

Better categorization of harm instances, ensuing in a badness graduated table system.

Designation of location as most of import similarity metric.

Better representation of hunt consequences through ocular interface.

Improvements in future instance logging techniques by using mechanization.

Hunter ‘s concluding twelvemonth undertaking investigated informations excavation, computational extraction and administration of informations and fix instance summarization. By making fix instance summaries that extract peculiar utile pieces of information, a user can salvage clip and attempt ( Chang & A ; Hsiao, 2008 ) . A paradigm hunt tool was developed by Hunter ‘s undertaking that was based around the Vivisimo hunt engine, and which utilised the instance sum-ups. Vivisimo package was developed specifically to let concerns to optimise their information retrieval techniques ( Vivisimo, 2011 ) . To cut down user work load and to help in historic instance seeking Vivisimo tool was found.

Xie has been involved extensively with understanding and researching current patterns within the In-Service Department. It was through his work that the semantic hunt saloon was implemented into the ISQ Database. This has allowed for faster seeking through usage of equivalent word, and besides by cut downing the clip intensive procedure of column filtering in Excel. Semantic engineerings allow greater entree to informations through the usage of a model or web, where relationships are established. Vivisimo besides utilises this semantic hunt engineering.

With respect to data visual image, the tool developed by Hunter, utilised a higher degree of ocular feedback than bing systems by supplying exposures and diagrams from the PDF files in the hunt consequences. However, neither Hunter ‘s system, nor the Semantic Search saloon developed by Xie, use a basically different manner of transporting out the hunt or categorizing the historic fix instances. They both rely on applied scientists come ining cardinal information into a hunt saloon.

Searching through the usage of cardinal words is comparatively simple engineering in comparing with modern web hunt engines. These tools rely much more on context, for illustration web pages are normally ranked in hunt engines through the figure and quality of hyperlinks they have to other relevant pages ( Henzinger, 2007 ) . Other research has shown benefits to following a scope of different hunt techniques other than cardinal word seeking. Harth ( 2010 ) developed a tool that utilised keyword searching as an initial manner of specifying an initial set of consequences, and so several other hunt techniques such as object focal point ( e.g. hyperlinks ) and way traverse ( e.g. a series of hyperlinks ) to happen specific consequences. This follows the same rules described by Buckland and Gey ( 1994 ) and Shneiderman ( 1998 ) of an initial overview hunt followed by a secondary elaborate hunt to happen a coveted consequence.

3. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

This overall undertaking aims at studying/analysing the historic instances page by page manually, that is stored by airbus with purpose of assisting the Airbus In-service squad in developing an efficient papers extraction technique. A set of 20 recorded instances were obtained from Airbus and is used for the analysis intent. The instances were analysed briefly and in deepness to happen out the nature and importance of the information available. This analysis consists of

Structure of the instances

The flow form of communicating

The study types involved and its construction.

Contributions from Media, computation, electronic mail and facsimile correspondence.

Page wise break down

The nature of the paperss, the manner the paperss are identified.

Graphs, pie charts and tabular columns are used to foreground the consequences obtained. The analysis was carried out with an aim that the historic instances are easy understood, the extraction procedure and job resolution techniques are self-handled by applied scientists

4. LITERATURE REVIEW

The undermentioned subdivision is a reappraisal of work that has been undertaken for this undertaking.

4.1 PORTABLE DOCUMENT FORMAT ( PDF )

The planetary criterion for capturing and reexamining rich information is Portable Document Format ( PDF ) .A A PDF is frequently used to unite informations and information from multiple beginnings, in peculiar applied scientists frequently seek information from multiple beginnings ( Liu et al. , 2007 ) which can be collaborated normally in this format. Data excavation and informations extraction from multiple elements in a PDF is hard ( Hassan and Baumgartner, 2007 ) this is due to the deficiency of structural information in PDF paperss ( Kwok and Nguyen, 2006 ) . The unstructured text within PDF paperss is difficult to question with automatic metadata gaining control of import as manual metadata shaping tools increase employee work loads, hence implementing the importance of understanding the papers construction in order to automatically pull out metadata ( Ojokoh et al. , 2009 ) .

4.2 SAMPLE CASE

A sample historic instance collected from Airbus is analysed foremost and its content is studied. The analysis revealed the work and information type, the in-service section covering with. The analyses lead to transport out an extended survey on Visual representation & A ; its function and Document decomposition strategies.

4.3 DOCUMENT DECOMPOSING

Document Decomposition is a method to break up a papers into balls and to give each ball a label. The labels and regulations are defined in document decomposition strategies. This method should supply an penetration into the physical and semantic construction of paperss. ( Dirk Schumacher 2005 ) The intent of papers decomposition is to do the content of an electronic papers more conformable to geographic expedition and to supply a agency “ by which content ( from individual or multiple paperss ) can be reconfigured and presented to accommodate the user ‘s current information demands ” .

The aims of papers decomposition are to supply ( Dirk Schumacher 2005 ) :

aˆ? Navigation within a Document

aˆ? Exploration utilizing faceted categorization hunt

aˆ? Summaries of paperss based on their constructions

aˆ? Isolation and extraction of specific mark elements bounded by a peculiar decomposition strategy

This attack has been created peculiarly for paperss of the technology sphere. Therefore, it is non merely developed to use to text-only paperss but besides to paperss that contain graphical elements: Therefore, for the intents of decomposition the graphical elements and their significance are of equal importance to the text.

Document decomposition comprises of three strategies ( S.J.Culley, pers.comm. , 8th June2012 )

Logical Content Decomposition ( LCD ) strategies

Media Type Decomposition ( MTD ) strategies

Technical Description Decomposition ( TDD ) strategies

Different points of position of a papers are emphasized by each strategy. The character of a ball of a papers and its function within the context is focused by the LCD strategy. The MTD strategy describes merely the manner how the information is transmitted. Therefore, it is non applicable for text-only paperss. It provides an overview of the incorporating sorts of media ( e.g. drawings, text, and sound ) of a papers. The connotation of a papers is focused by TDD strategy. It is based on the descriptive character of proficient paperss. The Media Type Decomposition strategy is really utile for both applications inter- and intra-document retrieval and provides an penetration into the physical and layout construction of a papers ( Dirk Schumacher 2005 ) .

4.4 VISUAL REPRESENTATION OF DOCUMENTS

The ocular representation uses diagrams, charts to stand for informations and Knowledge The combination of artworks, image and picture in paperss are said to be ocular representation. The information is put in to chart or image or in any kind of ocular medium for easy apprehension and reading of informations. The ocular representation of the informations reduces the cognitive work needed to execute certain undertakings.

Graphs, diagram, drawings are normally used in paperss for research, understanding and reading of consequences. The effectual usage of illustrations ( images, charts, graphs, and diagrams ) in instructional stuffs is an of import aspect of instructional message design. The function of ocular representation is important in conveying information ( Paton & A ; Neilson 1999 ) .

4.5 ROLE OF IMAGE AND GRAPHS

Images and graphs are critical portion of stand foring a information in diagrammatic from. Information or information sets illustrated as images and graphs are easy to understand and construe. In service sector of aerospace industry the jobs on aircraft, in specific if wing has encountered a job means it will be easy understood by the applied scientists, if depicted in image signifier instead than text signifier.

Tables, images and diagrams are frequently built-in constituents of paperss. Each of these document constituents is characteristic of diagrammatic representations. Their reading is related to the human encephalon ‘s capacity for analogical ( or spatial ) logical thinking ( Srihari et al. , 1992 )

Tables are used in paperss as an effectual agencies of pass oning property-value information refering to several informations points ( keys ) . Diagrams, like tabular arraies, are used to convey information which is understood by worlds more readily when presented visually. This class is really diverse and includes spheres such as maps, technology drawings, flow charts, etc. The intent of diagram apprehension can be either one or both of the followers: ( I ) to transform the paper representation into a more utile mark representation ( two ) to deduce a more compact representation of the information for the intents of archival ( Srihari et al. , 1992 ) .

From a paper named Machine Graphics & A ; Vision ( Annon, 1994, pp. 77-103 ) the most common utilizations of diagrams are:

Data presentation: It means encoding of some informations in ocular format, intended to pass on it to other party. If both an conceiver and receiver are worlds, it is the traditional in writing design field. In instance of computing machine conceiver and human receiver, it is called either informations visual image, or else presentation design. Human conceiver and computing machine receiver represent the instance of diagrammatic informations input. The man-machine graphical interfaces normally combine several of the above instances.

Diagrammatic representation: It means in general encoding any informations in diagrammatic signifier, largely for storage intents, to be subsequently used as a information or cognition base, by the same or other party, be it human or computing machine.

Diagrammatic concluding involves usage of diagrammatic representations to help information processing, particularly pull outing new facts from the 1s encoded in the representation. The logical thinking may be either made merely by a human, or merely by a computing machine, or in other combinations. Useful new dimension in this instance involves separating internal usage of a diagram ( ocular imagery- homo or computing machine ) and external usage of a diagram ( diagram drawing as an assistance to reasoning-usually specific to worlds ) .

4.6 Summary:

The literature reappraisal discusses the land work carried out for the thesis. The format in which the historic instances are stored, PDF is studied. A research has been carried out on ocular representation and Documentation. With the aid of sample instance, a set of 20 historic instances ten from A320 household and 10 from A330 household is collected and a elaborate analysis has been carried out. The undermentioned subdivision methodological analysis and deliverables explains the methods followed for the analysis and the end product for the analysis is delivered.

5. METHODOLOGY AND DELEVERABLES

This subdivision provides the methods followed and stairss taken to accomplish the defined aims. Each historic instance received from Airbus is analysed manually page by page for the different types of information available. The analysed information is recorded in Excel sheet and consequences are aforethought utilizing graphs. The aim is achieved by transporting out four phase of stage work. The four stage of work carried out are

Phase I CATEGORIZATION

Phase II COMMUNICATION AND REPORTS AVAILABLITY

Phase III INDIVIDUAL BREAKDOWN

Phase IV DECOMPOSITION

5.1 PHASE 1: Classification

Classification of information is carried out to happen the type of information available in each and every instance. The available information is tagged individually and similar information is tagged under separate heading. From the overview each instance were found to possess different information viz. correspondence, diagrams, exposures, computations, tabular columns etc. Microsoft office excel is used to enter the handiness of the information and exemplify the consequences as tabular columns and graphs.

The possible dislocation done is shown in figure 1. The instances are foremost analysed to happen the figure of paperss available. It is followed by analyzing the instances for artworks, correspondence and computations. The tabular array 1 shows the figure of pages consumed by instance scopes from 5 to 552 and the identified paperss runing from 3 to 57. The papers is termed as the set of pages used for individual correspondence or single studies. It is clear that each instance has a part from correspondence and graphics/sketch. 9 out of 20 instances have part from computations

FIGURE 1: CATERGORIZATION BREAKDOWN

CASE NO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

NO OF DOCUMENTS IDENTIFIED

17

33

32

7

6

13

13

23

22

11

57

32

3

13

11

11

4

7

3

3

Entire No OF PAGES

77

266

64

14

9

32

27

45

62

37

552

104

9

59

36

37

20

23

5

9

Entire NUMBER OF CORRESPONDENCE

13

48

34

6

6

19

15

22

24

12

56

32

3

14

10

11

2

4

1

1

Entire NUMBER OF SKETCH/GRAPHICS

20

281

13

2

2

11

4

9

16

10

276

39

2

28

11

15

11

8

1

5

Entire NUMBER OF PAGES WITH CALCULATION

13

16

9

4

160

11

1

11

1

Table 1: Entire CASES SUMMARY

FIGURE 2: Entire CASE SUMMARY GRAPH

The graph ( i.e. figure 2 ) stress on the consequences obtained from the entire instance sum-up tabular array 1. It is clear that the major part is from sketch/graphics. Calculation and correspondence follows study in per centum part. The per centum part of the chief three classs is depicted in the pie graph ( figure 3 ) shown below. It is clear that out of 1498 pages of entire instances 764 pages have been consumed by sketch/ artworks ( i.e ) 46 % .

FIGURE 3: Percentage Contribution

5.1.1 SKETCH/GRAPHICS:

The sketch/graphics are the media types related to the instances. It is a medium of construing information or information. A user can easy understand the information conveyed through this medium. Proof or grounds is provided to back up the information provided for the user through this medium. The study class is sub classified into

Formal Diagram

Formal Diagram + Annotation

Photograph

Photo + Annotation

Cad

SRM FD

SRM PHOTO

Trial Consequences

In general the graphics/ study illustrate or depict parts of aircraft or harm of aircraft. This even includes some trial consequences. The artworks can be a Formal diagram which is defined as the normal diagrams created by applied scientists. The same kind of diagram with notes ( i.e. ) markers or descriptions is tagged under formal diagrams and notes. Some instances depicts exposure and some including notes.

The study drawn utilizing computing machine aided design ( CAD ) package is tagged under CAD. A service fix manual ( SRM ) is provided to the aircraft operators which provided fix direction that could transport out by the operators.

CASE NO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

FORMAL DIAGRAMS

1

2

3

9

5

FORMAL DIAGRAMS + ANNOTATIONS

8

21

1

2

2

1

3

13

3

26

23

2

2

1

1

2

PHOTGRAPHS

2

37

8

3

2

4

67

7

1

9

6

13

10

5

PHOTOGRAPH + ANNOTATION

4

82

1

2

6

2

2

3

8

0

1

17

3

1

1

CAD DIA

4

22

6

Trial Consequence

134

4

DIAGRAMS/ PHOTOGRAPHS FROM SRM

2

140

3

10

Entire NUMBER PAGES OF SKETCH

20

140

13

2

2

11

4

9

16

10

276

39

2

28

11

15

11

8

1

5

Entire No OF PAGES

77

266

64

14

9

32

27

45

62

37

552

104

9

59

36

37

20

23

5

9

Table 2: SKETCH/GRAPHICS Summary

FIGURE 4: SKETCH/GRAPHICS Summary

The diagrams in SRM are tagged individually. Some trial consequences end product are shown in diagrams, for illustration supersonic trial, these trial consequences are tagged individually. The tabular array 2 shows the handiness of study inside informations in each instance. It gives a elaborate sum-up of study bomber classs. The information recorded in table 2 is shown in graph figure 4. It is apparent from the graph that all instance has a part from study. Case 2 and case11 have about more than 50 % pages of part from study out of the entire figure of pages. It can be seen that there are more studies with notes and less CAD diagrams and less SRM studies.

5.1.2 Correspondence:

The correspondence is termed as a communicating medium through which every section or the applied scientists are contacted. The correspondence can be mail, facsimile, telephone etc. Each instance is manually analysed and classified. The

CASE NO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

NO OF PAGES CORRESPONDENCE USING EMAIL

8

26

13

3

4

7

8

8

13

8

24

1

3

4

3

2

1

2

1

2

NO OF PAGES CORRESPONDENCE USING FAX

11

46

23

2

2

9

10

15

10

7

40

32

2

13

7

10

1

3

2

1

NO OF PAGES INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE

8

26

24

4

4

10

3

15

19

9

37

21

2

9

7

6

1

3

NO OF PAGES OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE

5

22

10

2

2

9

12

7

5

3

19

11

1

5

3

5

1

1

1

1

Entire Page

13

48

34

6

6

19

15

22

24

12

56

32

3

14

10

11

2

4

1

1

Entire No OF PAGES

77

266

64

14

9

32

27

45

62

37

552

104

9

59

36

37

20

23

5

9

Table 3 Correspondence

correspondence is classified into electronic mail and facsimile. It is farther divided as entrance and outgoing.

Each correspondence has aircraft inside informations and topic sing which it is posed. The table 3 provides elaborate information on the figure of pages the correspondences consume. The tabular array besides provides the information on incoming facsimile and electronic mail, surpassing facsimile and electronic mail. Percentage part of minimal 12 % to maximum 67 % is witnessed. It can besides been seen that the entrance correspondence is ever greater than the outgoing in every instance.

The entrance correspondences ( i.e. ) received by Airbus are the harm questions from client through SEER seeking fix instructions. The outgoing correspondence consists of fix instructions and applied scientists approved studies in bulk. Some outgoing correspondence belongs to clarification cell inquiring aircraft operators ( i.e ) the client to unclutter the uncertainties arrived.

5.1.3 Calculation:

Calculations are meant to be an of import grounds to back up a consequence. It is an estimation on known facts and informations. The historic instances possess computations to happen elements viz. emphasis, weariness, corrosion degree, flying place etc. The computation group is divided into three types viz.

Standard

Master

REPEATED

CASE NO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

Standard

7

11

9

4

121

10

4

1

REPEATED

3

Master

6

5

36

1

1

4

COMPUTER PROGRAM

3

Entire NUMBER CALCULATION

13

16

9

4

160

11

1

11

1

Table 4: Calculation Summary

Standard computations are tagged for the computations that are predefined, for illustration informations tabular arraies that possess values for certain maps. The computation or consequences that are used normally or referred are tagged under standard computations. Original computations are termed for the computations that are derived are formulated newly for work outing comparative questions. As the name defines, the computation that are repeated more than one clip in a instance is grouped under repeated computations

FIGURE 5 CALCULATION SUMMARY GRAPH

The tabular array 4 shows figure of page each group consume and the graph figure 5 interprets the informations recorded for the handiness of computation in every individual instance. It is clear that merely nine instances have part from computations. Case 11 has high Numberss of pages for computations and four instances have merely standard computations

5.1.4 Summary:

Phase I work emphasizes on the classification of information available in each instance. This classifications lead to happen kind of information available in each and their part. It can be concluded that there are major part from study followed by correspondence and computations. The figure of pages with Aircraft figure, tabular columns, signatures, and handiness of fond regards are besides done. The tabular array of full analysis for the 20 instances are shown in Appendix.

5.2 PHASE II COMMUNICATION AND REPORTS AVAILABLITY:

The stage 2 work is carried out to happen

The communicating procedure taking topographic point inside the service section ( i.e. ) who is reaching and who is being contacted.

The studies available in each instance and the information available in each study

The harm and aircraft inside informations of each and every instance

5.2.1 Communication:

The figure 6 exhibits the communicating flow that is taking topographic point in the in-service section. The clients are the aircraft operators who experience amendss and questions. The SEER acts as barrier between Aircraft operator and AUK.

FIGURE 6: Communication Flow

It organise the questions received from the aircraft operator across the universe and directs it to respective fix unit. The AUK, a Wing fix unit located at Filton, is contacted by SEER ( i.e ) SEER forwards the harm questions to AUK for fix instructions.

5.2.2 AVAILABLITY OF REPORTS:

The initial analyses carried lead to happen many comparative studies, back uping each and every instance. These studies are found to hold their ain importance. The studies available in each individual instance is has its ain importance and part. The table 5 emphasize on the studies available in each instance. Each study has its ain importance. It is understood that Daily fix petition, proficient Disposition, Repair design Approval Sheet, System In-service drumhead sheet are found to be commom in about all instance.

The day-to-day fix sheet which is besides know as Airdoc sheet is present in all instance. Airdoc comprises of

CASE NO

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

DAILY REPAIR REQUEST

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

TECHNICAL DISPOSITION

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

REPAIR DESIGN APPROVAL SHEET

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

SERVICE INSERVICE SUMMARY SHEET

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

FATIGUE JUSTIFICATION

1

1

STRUCTURE REPAIR MANUAL

1

DAMAGE REPORT

1

1

1

1

1

1

STATIC JUSTIFICATION

1

1

TECHNICAL Request

1

1

1

1

Technology Disposition

1

SERIVICE BULLETIN

1

FATIGUE APPROVAL SHEET

1

STATIC SHEET APPROVAL SHEET

1

1

STRENGTH SUMMARY SHEET

1

TECHNICAL ADAPTION

1

CHECK STRESS CALCUATION

1

N D T REPORT

1

1

JUSTIFICATION REPORT

1

Table 5 REPORTS Summary

Aircraft inside informations

A/C NUMBER

AIRCRAFT TYPE

AIRLINE NAME

Flight Cycles

Flight Hours

Title

Damage name

Indate

Governments signature

Techincal temperament provides the review to be embodied for the inspected harm. This study carries

Aircraft inside informations

Introduction which tells what harm has been diagonised and where it has been found.

Inspection & A ; Repair Instruction to be carried.

Refferences

Technical dispositon besides posses some media types. These studies are compliled by an applied scientists and checked for emphasis by another individual and approved by another applied scientist. In commom three signature can be found.

REPAIR DESIGN APPROVAL SHEET

RDAS is acronym for fix design blessing sheet. This sheet keep the information of aircraft and damage/repair description. Where and what informations of harm is indicated with the carried fix inside informations. Repair and justification mentions are besides provided. Authorisation and blessing inside informations of applied scientists are besides availble in this sheet.

Service ITEMISED SUMMARY SHEET

SISS is acronym for Service point drumhead sheet. Aircraft inside informations, harm and fix desriptiona and its mentions are provided. This sheet besides holds the justification information. The signature inside informations of staic and weariness applied scientists are available.

5.2.3 DAMAGE DESCRIPTION AND DETAILS:

The harm and aircraft inside informations associating to each instance is identified and medium through which harm evinced is investigated in item. The table 6 provided high spots the harm rubric, aircraft inside informations and the medium through which the harm is interpreted.It is clear that in most instances the harm is interpreted through a official harm study and exposure fond regards.

CASE NO

Damage Name

Damage AT

MSN

Flight CYLES

Flight Hours

Airlines

Damage ILLUSTRATED THROUGH

1

Corrosion

chief landing gear pintle pin, LH flying

326

11677

43196

Emirates Dubai

Damage study

2

Oversized holes and surrogate fasteners

outboard taking border, LH flying

696

5568

17661

Egypt air/ Cairo

Photograph

3

Corrosion

chief landing gear support rib, aft pintle frontward & A ; aft Lugs, both wings

348

10992

41061

Emirates Dubai

NDT trial study

4

Fastener designation

interior flap and wriggling, right manus flying

102

0

0

Cathay Pacific, Hong kong

Photograph

5

Question on seal coloring material difference

under flying entree panel

Gen

0

0

China airlines/ Taipei

Photograph

6

Crack aft refuel pipe fond regard hole

RHW

388

6484

46531

us air passages

CAD Diagram

7

Delamination

interior aileron tip molding, lower surface, RH flying

393

10078

34463

Cathay Pacific, Hong kong

Photograph

8

Rust harm coating

outboard interface tablet, flap path 5, LH

365

11493

43182

Emirates Dubai

Photograph

9

Crack

Centre spar angle, root articulation, rib 1 interface, both wings

333

7768

51816

US Air passages

10

Multiple impact harm due to tyre explosion

chief landing cogwheel fixed fairing, LH

132

18839

38243

Air Transat

Photograph

CASE NO

Damage Name

Damage AT

MSN

Flight CYLES

Flight Hours

Airlines

Damage ILLUSTRATED THROUGH

11

Corrosion

Bottom tegument left manus wing

331

20869

43349

Gatx renting carbon monoxide

Formal harm study

12

Corrosion

Upper surface lower rim, gear rib 5, RHW

1334

14859

31652

Taca houseman. airlines/san saiva

Photo, fd & A ; damage test study fond regard with mail

13

Damage at draging border and aileron

RHW

934

26805

26969

Tame

Photo fond regard with mail

14

Impact harm

Flying tip fencing and flying tip construction

4532

1572

3732

Tiger air passages

Company harm study

15

Crack and delamination

Movable flap path fairing, RH flying

2380

11598

16709

Easy jet

Company proficient petition fond regard

16

Damagess holes

Forward fairing assembly

1147

16

25

German wings

Damage study

17

Nut corrosion and sleeve harm

Forward pylon tap, RHW

gen

0

0

British air passages

Photo fond regard with mail

18

Gouge grade

Rib 12 stiffener between stringers 14-15, LHW

534

33158

34714

All Nippon airwaya/ Tokyo

Formal Defense Intelligence Agency and cad Defense Intelligence Agency attach. with mail

19

Minimum allowable thickness exceeded

Trunnion chafe wear, RHW

633

17823

40237

Dragon air Hongkong

Photo fond regard with mail

20

Flap trap assembly question

Both wings

1238

0

0

Sodium

Photo fond regard with mail

Table 6 DAMAGE DESRIPTION

5.3 PHASE III INDIVIDUAL BREAKDOWN:

The stage III work elucidates single interrupt down carried out for selective instances. Two single dislocations have been carried out viz.

Detailed ANALYSIS OF CASE 11

NATURE OF INFORMATION

5.3.1 Detailed ANALYSIS OF CASE 11:

A elaborate analysis for instance 11 is carried out. Case 11 is chosen for the elaborate analysis as it contains maximal figure of pages and extra studies that are n’t available in other instances.

REPORT NAME

Pages

DAMAGE REPORT

170

SERVICE REPAIR MANUAL

23

T D

2

AERODYNAMIC STATEMENT

2

R D A S

22

S I S S

1

STATIC JUSTI. REPORT

25

Compaction ANALYSIS

13

STRINGER BOLT REPORT

4

Tension ANALYSIS

9

RESERVE FACTOR SUMMARY

4

FRONT SPAR LOADING ANALYSIS

3

CHECK STRESS ANALYSIS

11

SKIN BOLTING ANALYSIS

1

STATIC STRENGTH APPR. Sheet

3

FATIGUE APPR. Sheet

15

F & A ; DT JUSTIFICATION

130

REMAINING

50

Entire NO OF PAGES

552

Table 7 REPORTS Summary

FIGURE 7 REPORT SUMMARY GRAPH

FORMAL DIAGRAMS

9

FORMAL DIAGRAMS + ANNOTATIONS

26

PHOTGRAPHS

67

PHOTOGRAPH + ANNOTATION

8

CAD DIA

22

Trial Consequence

134

DIAGRAMS/ PHOTOGRAPHS FROM SRM

10

Entire NUMBER OF SKETCH

276

Table 8 CASE 11 SKETCH SUMMARY

FIGURE 8 CASE 11 SKETCH SUMMARY GRAPH

The tabular array 7 and its several graph, figure 8 shows the studies inside informations and its entire page part. It is apparent that harm study and F & A ; DT justification study have more figure of pages. Table 8 and its several graph, figure 9 gives the inside informations of study and part of its classs. It is seen that 49 % of the study is consumed by trial consequences. Here the trial consequences are the consequences of an experimental apparatus that are carried out and illustrated utilizing artworks.

5.3.2 NATURE OF INFORMATION

The nature of information that is available in 10 selective instances are studied and analysed.

CASE 11:

DOCUMENT NO

UNDERSTANDING/ RESOLVING/ SOLVING

Reason

Date

1

Understanding

It ‘s an airdoc sheet incorporating aircraft inside informations, Damage name, studies available, and individuals signed for blessing.

In: 18.01.2010

Target:

19.01.2010

2

Understanding

Contains mail forwarded from SER to AUK fix unit from Lufthansa Airlines. It has a harm study fond regard holding harm inside informations and fix proposal.

12.02.2010

40 exposures

2 CAD

46 Test consequences Defense Intelligence Agency.

3

Clarification

Reply from AUK inquiring for elucidation sing grid readings, whether old location studies are for mention

17.02.2010

4

Understanding

Reply from SEER with clarified study fond regard sent from Lufthansa air passages.

03.03.2010

11 exposures

2 CAD

18 trial consequences

5

Understanding

Reply mail from AUK to SEER saying high volume of work burden and giving advice on work to be carried at this phase. Rectification from operator is asked.

05.03.2010

6

Solving

Mail to AUK from SEER inquiring for complete concluding fix direction with provided inside informations.

12.03.2010

1 exposure

2 CAD

4 trial consequences

7

Solving

Repair instructions and advice from AUK to SEER

17.03.2010

8

Solving

From AUK to SEER remarks on damaged countries

19.03.2010

9

Deciding

From Lufthansa to SEER, feedbacks

01.04.2010

CAD 2

Test consequences 3

10

Solving

From SEER to Lufthansa proficient temperament ( fix processs )

26.03.2010

1 FD+A, 1 Cad

11

Deciding

Lufthansa waiting for concluding fix direction, from SEER to AUK, fond regard of Structural fix manual

12.04.2010

12

Solving

Remarks provided for damaged countries by AUK to SEER

12.04.2010

13

work outing

From AUK to SEER, attached fix instructions

AUK TO SEER, instructions to operator

AUK TO SEER, instructions to operator

14.04.2010

30.06.2010

04.07.2010

SRM FD 10

14

deciding

Lufthansa studies to be reviewed and repair instructions to be provided

20.07.2010

15

1 trial consequences

16

Decide

From SEER to AUK, to reexamine Lufthansa study and supply instructions

21.07.2010

17

Understanding

From SEER to AUK

22.07.2010

18

Decide

Visionary to AUK, reappraisal LTM study and to supply instructions

10.08.2010

1 trial consequence

19

understanding

AUK to SEER

11.08.2010

20

elucidation

SEER to AUK, reappraisal LTM study and to supply instructions

18.08.2010

1 trial consequence

21

Understanding

SEER to AUK, reappraisal LTM study and to supply instructions

27.08.2010

22

Understanding

AUK to SEER

20.08.2010

23

Understanding

AUK to SEER

31.08.2010

24

Understanding

AUK to SEER

31.08.2010

25

understanding

AUK to SEER

02.09.2010

26

Deciding

SEER to AUK, requested to reexamine and supply preliminary remarks

10.09.2010

2 trial consequences

27

Understanding

Advice to operator, from AUK to SEER

13.09.2010

28

Deciding

From SEER to AUK, bespeaking, fix design, emphasis, RAS issue ( relevant paperss )

03.1.2011

29

Understanding

From AUK to SEER, bespeaking to alter RAS deadline

11.01.2011

30

Deciding

SEER to AUK, reappraisal of LMT feedback and issue of RAS, fastener installing inside informations

03.02.2011

31

understanding

AUK to SEER, operator has deviated from instructions and has requested for verification

18.02.2011

32

Understanding

Reply to deviation verification

24.02.2011

33

Solving

Aeromechanicss statement attached, from SEER AUK

04.03.2011

2 FD

34

Understanding

Reticular activating system

35

Understanding

Sister

36

Solving

Inactive justification study, contains original computation ( ref )

25.02.2011

3 FD+A

37

Understanding

Compaction analysis trial ( ref )

Sept 97

38

Understanding

Analysis of stringers ( ref )

Oct 97

39

Understanding

Tension analysis ( ref )

Oct 97

2 FD+A

40

Understanding

Reserve factor sum-up ( ref )

Feb 98

41

Understanding

Front spar lading analysis ( ref )

Mar 98

42

Understanding

Check emphasis analysis ( ref )

Oct 97

5 FD+A

43

Understanding

Skin bolting analysis ( ref )

Dec 97

44

Understanding

Reserve factor sum-up ( ref )

Jan 98

45

Understanding

RDTAS

46

Understanding

STATIC STRENGTH APPROVAL SHEET

47

Solving

FATIGUE APPROVAL SHEET

48

Solving

F & A ; DT JUSTIFICATION, DAMAGE AND REPAIR DESCRIPTION WITH TEST RESULTS

1.08.2011

11 FD+A

5 FD

15 Photograph

8 PHOTO+ Angstrom

52 Trial Consequence

49

Decide

Visionary TO CUSTOMER

16.09.2011

50

understanding

SEER TO AUK

16.09.2011

51

understanding

RDTAS

52

work outing

FATIGUE APPROVAL SHEET

53

work outing

SEER TO AUK

27.09.2011

54

work outing

SEER TO AUK

12.10.2011

55

understanding

RDTAS

56

understanding

STATIC STRENGTH APPROVAL SHEET

57

understanding

FATIGUE APPROVAL SHEET

CASE 12

Document no

Nature

Reasons

Date

1

Understanding

It ‘s an Airdoc sheet incorporating aircraft inside informations, Damage name, studies available, and individuals signed for blessing.

26.10.2010

2

understanding

From SEER to AUK, bespeaking for preliminary remarks

26.10.2010

1 FD

2 FD+A

1 Photograph

1 Trial Consequence

3

Resoluteness

Response from AUK to SEER bespeaking for full damaged study as informations sent is deficient, saying probes had started with informations provided

26.10.2010

4

Solving

From SEER to AUK, supplying function required and inquiring for reappraisal and fix recommendations

26.10.2010

2 fd+a

2 exposure

2 trial consequences

5

Deciding

From AUK to SEER, saying, grid analysis sent is deficient for analysis, inquiring specification for fastners removed

27.10.2010

6

Deciding

From AUK to SEER, saying airbus noticed some disagreements in the clients damaged study and inquiring for accounts.

27.10.2010

7

Deciding

Feedback information from client to airbus

27.10.2010

1 fd

2 fd+a

2 exposure

1 trial consequences

8

Solving

Asking for reappraisal and fix recommendations, from SEER to AUK

28.10.2010

9

Understanding

From AUK to SEER

28.10.2010

10

Solving

From client to airbus, inquiring for fix instructions

29.10.2010

11

understanding

From visionary to AUK

29.10.2010

12

Deciding

From client to airbus

30.10.2010

13

deciding

From Airtac to client, TD is attached

30.10.2010

14

deciding

From AUK to SEET

29.10.2010

15

solve

From client to Airbus

1.11.2010

16

resoluteness

From SEER TO AUK

02.11.2010

17

understanding

From AUK to SEER

02.11.2010

18

resoluteness

From SEER TO AUK

06.11.2010

19

Decide

From client to airbus

06.11.2010

1 exposure

20

Solve

From AUK to SEER

07.11.2010

21

Resoluteness

From SEER TO AUK

07.11.2010

22

Resoluteness

From AUK to SEER

08.11.2010

23

SOLVE

From client to airbus

08.11.2010

24

SOLVE

FROM SEER TO AUK

09.11.2010

25

Resoluteness

FROM SEER TO AUK

10.11.2010

26

Resoluteness

FROM AUK TO SEER

10.11.2010

27

Understanding

FROM CUSTOMER TO AIRBUS

14.11.10

28

SOLVE

FROM SEER TO AUK

14.11.2010

29

Understanding

RDAS

15.11.2010

30

Understanding

Sister

15.11.2010

31

UNIDENTIFIED

UNIDENTIFIED

UIDENTIFIED

32

Understanding

WORKS AND CALCULATION CARRIED

15.11.2010

33

Understanding

FSTIGUE JUSTIFICATION REPORT WHICH HAS SUMMARY OF DAMAGE AND REPAIR INSTURCTIONS

16.11.2010

CASE 13

DOCUMENT NO

Nature

Reason

Date

1

Understanding

It ‘s an Airdoc sheet incorporating aircraft inside informations, Damage name, studies available, and individuals signed for blessing

06.02.2012 IN & A ; TARGET

2

Resoluteness

SEER TO AUK, CONTAINS A SERVICE REPAIR MANUAL

06.02.2012

2 Photograph

3

Resolution

FROM AUK TO SEER

06.02.2012

CASE 14

DOCUMENT NO.

Date

Nature

Reason

1

In and aim day of the month 14.12.2011

understanding

It ‘s an Airdoc sheet incorporating aircraft inside informations, Damage name, studies available, and individuals signed for blessing

2

14.12.2011

Solving

From SEER TO AUK, CONTAINS A DAMAGE REPORT

3 Photograph

3

14.12.2011

Solving

FROM SEER TO AUK, CONTAINS A AMAGE REPORT, MORE DAMAGE FOUND

4 exposure + A

4

14.12.2011

Understanding

From SEER TO AUK

5

14.12.2011

Resoluteness

FROM SEER TO AUK ASKING FOR CHECK REPORT AND ASSESS REWORK PERFORMED

6

14.12.2011

SOLVE

FROM SEER TO AUK, PRELIMINARY INSPECTION PROGRAM IS GIVEN, INCLUDES DAMAGE REPORT

1 Photograph

4 PHOTO + A

7

14.12.2011

Resolution

FROM AUK TO SEER, ADVICE TO OPERATOR IS PROVIDED AND TD IS ATTACHED

4 Photograph

8

14.12.2011

Understanding

DAMAGE REPORT IS ENCLOSED, WITH INSPECTION RESULTS FROM SEER TO AUK

9

14.12.2011

Resolution

FOUND A CRAK AND SIAEC PROVIDED NEW REPORT, REQUEST FOR REPAIR INSTRUCTIONS, ATTACHED DAMAGED REPORT

1 Photograph

1 PHOTO +A

10

14.12.2011

Resolution

FROM AUK TO SEER WITH TD ATTACHED, PROVIDEING INSPECTION TO BE EMBODIED.

11

15.12.2011

Deciding

From SEER TO AUK, REQUESTINF ADVICE, DAMAGE REPORT IS ATTACHED

12

15.12.2011

Resolution

FROM AUK TO SEET, WITH TD ATTACHED PROVIDING INSPECTION INSTRUCTIONS

4 PHOTO + A

1 FD+A

13

15.12.2011

Understanding

FROM AUK TO SEER

CASE 15

DOUMENT NO

Nature

Reason

Date

1

Understanding

It ‘s an Airdoc sheet incorporating aircraft inside informations, Damage name, studies available, and individuals signed for blessing

IN 24.04.2010

Target 29.04.2010

2

SOLVE

From visionary to auk, bespeaking for reappraisal and fix remarks, proficient petition and technology temperaments are attached.

28.04.2010

1 P + A

1 Phosphorus

3

Resoluteness

from auk to seer, bespeaking operator to execute removal instructions and ndt review and to supply with studies of the findings

29.04.2010

4

Resolution

from visionary to auk, technology temperament is attached, reappraisal and fix instructionare requested

03.05.2010

2 P+A

1 Phosphorus

5

Understanding

from AUK TO SEER, thanking for feedback and information that they are transporting on with analysis field-grade officer harm

04.05.2010

6

Understanding

FROM SEER TO AUK

04.05.2010

7

SOLVE

FROM AUK TO SEER, answer to last message dated 04.05.2010, inquiring to transport out fix in conformity with fix direction, and operator is requested to describe back.

05.05.2010

8

Decide

From SEER TO AUK, petition for RAS

07.05.2010

9

Understanding

Reticular activating system

10.05.2010

10

Understanding

Sister

10.05.2010

11

UNDERSTANGING

STATIC JUSTIFICATION. THE REPORTER DAMAGE HAS BEEN RESPONDED

10.05.2010

FD+A 2

PHOTO 4

CASE 16:

Document no

Nature

Reason

Date

1

Understanding

It ‘s an Airdoc sheet incorporating aircraft inside informations, Damage name, studies available, and individuals signed for blessing

In: 30.06.2010

Target: 06.07.2010

2

Solving

From SEER TO AUK, contains damage study

30.06.2010

4 Photograph

3

Resoluteness

FROM AUK TO SEER

06.07.2010

4

Understanding

FROM SEER TO AUK

08.07.2010

5

Resoluteness

FROM SEER TO AUK

06.07.2010

6

Understanding

FROM TO AUK TO SEER

09.07.2010

7

SOLVE

FROM SEER TO AUK, bespeaking reappraisal and TD and contains damage study

12.07.2010

4 Photograph

8

Resoluteness

FROM AUK TO SEER,

14.07.2010

9

SOLVE

FROM SEER TO AUK, bespeaking reappraisal and has damage study fond regard

30.09.2010

5 Photograph

1 PHOTO+A

10

Resoluteness

FROM SEER TO AUK

15.07.2010

11

Understanding

contains a TD with fix process

06.07.2010

TD. APPROVAL:04.10.2010

CASE 17

DOCUMENT NO

Nature

Reason

Date

1

Understanding

It ‘s an Airdoc sheet incorporating aircraft inside informations, Damage name, studies available, and individuals signed for blessing

Inch: 19.10.2011

Target: 24.10.2011

2

Resolution

TO AUK

18.10.2011

2 Photograph

1 FD+A

3

Resolution

TO AUK

24.10.2011

8 Photograph

4

Resoluteness

FROM AUK TO SEER

25.10.2011

CASE 18

DOCUMENT NO

Nature

Reason

Date

1

Understanding

It ‘s an Airdoc sheet incorporating aircraft inside informations, Damage name, studies available, and individuals signed for blessing

Inch: 13.06.2011

Target: 15.06.2011

2

Resolution

DAMAGE REPORT IS ATTACHED, REQUESTING AUK TO REVIEW REPORT AND PROVIDE COMMENTS

13.06.2011

1 FD+A

2 CAD DIA

3

Resolution

FROM AUK TO SEER WITH TD PROVIDING REPAIR PROCEDURE

14.06.2011

4

Resoluteness

SEER TO AUK REQUESTING TO REVIEW THE REPAIR FEEDBACK AND TO PROVIDE RELEVANT DOCUMENTS

22.06.2011

5

Understanding

RDTAS

27.06.2011

6

Understanding

STATIC STRENGTH APRROVAL SHEET

27.06.2011

7

Understanding

FATIGUE APPROVAL SHEET

27.06.2011

CASE 19

DOCUMENT NO

Nature

Reason

Date

1

Understanding

It ‘s an Airdoc sheet incorporating aircraft inside informations, Damage name, studies available, and individuals signed for blessing

INDATE: 19.09.2011

TARGETDATE: 20.09.2011

2

Resolution

FROM SEER TO AUK, REQUESTING REVIEW OF DAMAE REPORT AND COMMENTS

19.09.2011

1 Photograph

3

Understanding

FROM AUK TO SEER

20.09.2011

CASE 20:

DOCUMENT NO

Nature

Reason

Date

1

Understanding

It ‘s an Airdoc sheet incorporating aircraft inside informations, Damage name, studies available, and individuals signed for blessing

IN DATE:28.10.2011